Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 892 SW2D 213 - Mitchell v. State

Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 1997
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 8th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Grunsfeld v. State · Lewis v. State · Murdock v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]vidence may be offered by the [S]tate and the defendant as to any matter the court deems relevant to sentencing, including but not limited to the prior criminal record of the defendant, his general reputation, his character, an opinion regarding his character, the circumstances of the offense for which he is being tried, and, notwithstanding Rules 404 and 405, Texas Rules of Criminal Evidence, any other evidence of an extraneous crime or bad act that is shown beyond a reasonable doubt by evidence to have been committed by the defendant or for which he could be held criminally responsible, regardless of whether he has previously been charged with or finally convicted of the crime or act.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[r]equirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is a preliminary requirement for the admissibility of the evidence of extraneous offenses rather than a part of the State's case and that it is the judge rather than the jury who should make that determination at the punishment stage of the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[e]vidence conform to the rules governing the admissibility of extraneous offenses or character evidence at the guilt/innocence phase.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.