Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

892 S.W.2d 767

Fenzl v. Gerhardt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1995

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1995-01-10

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1999

6 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-01-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2In this court-tried case, defendants appeal from judgments in favor of plaintiff in consolidated suits on a promissory note and for damages for fraud and misrepresentation.

¶3No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

/892/sw2d/767 · .json · Public domain