United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
893 F.2d 1269 · 1990
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 3742
Relies on Michel v. United States · Eisenstadt v. Baker · United States v. Bell · United States v. Michel · United States v. Harrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“considered together with other facts, one of which, of course, is the opportunity of the trial court to observe all witnesses and judge their credibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“must exercise its best judgment as to the application of the facts to these standards, its decision is entitled to one of deference on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.