Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 893 F.2d 1300 - United States v. Kaiser

United States v. Kaiser’s Empirical Analysis

893 F.2d 1300 · 1990

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2018 · most notably United States v. Dale (1993), United States v. Freyre-Lazaro (1993)

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

250199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Brown v. Ohio · Missouri v. Hunter · Blackledge v. Perry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “judged on the basis of the record that existed at the time the guilty plea was entered, [are] one[s] that the State may not constitutionally prosecute.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The elements of false filing under § 7206(1) are: (1) the making and subscribing of a tax return containing a written declaration that it was made under the penalties of perjury; (2) by one who did not believe the return to be true and correct as to every material matter; and (3) who acted in a willful, as opposed to a negligent manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Any person who ... [w]illfully makes and subscribes any return, statement, or other document, which contains or is verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury, and which he does not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter ... shall be guilty of a felony....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.