Titran v. Ackman’s Empirical Analysis
893 F.2d 145 · 1990
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Reed v. City of Chicago (1996), Salazar v. City of Chicago (1991)
36 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Graham v. Connor · Bell v. Wolfish · Daniels v. Williams · Whitley v. Albers · Archie v. City of Racine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“After Graham, 109 S.Ct. at 1871 n. 10; Whitley v. Albers, 475 U.S. 312 , 106 S.Ct. 1078 , 89 L.Ed.2d 251 (1986); Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 535-39 , 99 S.Ct. 1861, 1871-74 , 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979); ..., three different parts of the Bill of Rights apply in sequence during arrest and con finement. Force during arrest must be reasonable within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment; between arrest and conviction the government may not “punish” the suspect without due process of law; after conviction the government may not inflict cruel and unusual punishment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When a party moves for summary judgment on ground A, the opposing party need not address grounds B, C, and so on; the number of potential grounds for (and arguments against) summary judgment may be large, and litigation is costly enough without requiring parties to respond to issues that have not been raised on pain of forfeiting their position.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e intimated there [in Titran] that because an individual's right under the Fourth Amendment 'to be free of excessive force during an arrest has long been established,' a finding that too much force was used 'logically dispose[s]' of the immunity question.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.