Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 893 F.2d 148 - Geitz v. Lindsey

Geitz v. Lindsey’s Empirical Analysis

893 F.2d 148 · 1990

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
July 2020
most recently cited

46 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Littlefield v. McGuffey (1992), Wilson v. City of Chicago (1993)

46 federal appellate ·

4401990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Rascon v. Hardiman · Llaguno v. Mingey · Deitchman v. Er Squibb & Sons Inc · United States v. Garner · Nachtsheim v. Beech Aircraft Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]o error in either the admission or exclusion of evidence . . . is ground for granting a new trial or for setting aside a verdict or for vacating, modifying, or otherwise disturbing a judgment or order, unless refusal to take such action appears to the court inconsistent with substantial justice.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he relevant inquiry is not how the reviewing judges would have ruled if they had been considering the case in the first place, but rather whether any reasonable person could agree with the district court.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the trial court's balancing of probative value and unfair prejudice is highly discretionary and its decision on admissibility will be accorded 'great deference.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.