United States v. Teehee’s Empirical Analysis
893 F.2d 271 · 1990
Citation profile
58 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably United States v. Savoie (1993), United States v. Futrell (2000)
58 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742
Relies on Duncan v. United States · United States v. Hill · United States v. Richard · United States v. Duncan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall consider ... the financial resources of the defendant, the financial needs and earning ability of the defendant and the defendant's dependents, and such other factors as the court deems appropriate.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he determination of an appropriate restitution amount is by nature an inexact science,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Any dispute as to the proper amount or type of restitution shall be resolved by the court by the preponderance of the evidence. The burden of demonstrating the amount of the loss sustained by a victim as a result of the offense shall be on the attorney for the Government. The burden of demonstrating the financial resources of the defendant and the financial needs of the defendant and such defendant’s dependents shall be on the defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.