In re Sealed Case’s Empirical Analysis
893 F.2d 363 · 1990
Citation profile
49 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably United States v. Thomas (1997), United States v. A.R. (1994)
49 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 5031 · 18 U.S.C. § 5032 · 18 U.S.C. § 5037 · 18 U.S.C. § 5038 · 18 U.S.C. § 5039 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Kent v. United States · Stack v. Boyle · Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence of the following factors shall be considered, and findings with regard to each factor shall be made in the record, in assessing whether a transfer would be in the interest of justice: the age and social background of the juvenile; the nature of the alleged offense; the extent and nature of the juvenile’s prior delinquency record; the juvenile’s present intellectual development and psychological maturity; the nature of past treatment efforts and the juvenile’s response to such efforts; the availability of programs designed to treat the juvenile’s behavioral problems.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“safeguarded from disclosure to unauthorized persons.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. United States v. Three Juveniles · United States v. A.D. Pg Publishing Company, Publisher of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette in No. 93-3197, United States of America v. T.Y. Pg Publishing Company, Publisher of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette in No. 93-3205, United States of America v. T.Y. The Tribune-Review Publishing Company in No. 93-3209, United States of America v. A.D. Tribune-Review Publishing Company in No. 93-3225“The Act is premised on the notion that it is in the best interest of both the juvenile and society that juveniles be insulated from the stigma associated with criminal trials, the publicity, the retributive atmosphere and threat of criminal incarceration attendant to criminal proceedings. That right would be irretrievably lost, the decision would be 'effectively unreviewable,' if a transferred juvenile were forced to wait until after conviction in adult court before appealing his transfer.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.