Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 893 F.2d 63 - United States v. Summers

United States v. Summers’s Empirical Analysis

893 F.2d 63 · 1990

Citation profile

194
cited by 194 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2021
most recently cited

136 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 194 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2021 · most notably Williams v. United States (1992), United States v. Rusher (1992)

136 federal appellate · 3 district ·

18701990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3551 (Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on United States v. Diaz-Villafane · United States v. Franz · United States v. Colon · United States v. Lopez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 194 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission.”
    34 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “age (including youth ) is not ordinarily relevant in determining whether a sentence should be outside the applicable guidelines range.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “sufficient evidence to support a finding that [the aggravating] circumstance on which a departure is based actually exists in the particular case.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.