Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

893 F.2d 757

Docket No. 89-2232.

Clanton v. Harris County

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-02-06

2 counsel of record

Relies on Clark v. Tarrant County · Rheuark v. Shaw · Holloway v. Walker

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-02-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2022

2 federal appellate ·

201990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

James T. Oitzinger, Gerald M. Birnberg, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

Roderick Q. Lawrence, Asst. County Atty., Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and DUHE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Gregory Scott Clanton appeals the district court's 12(b)(6) dismissal of his Sec. 1983 claim against Harris County. He sued Harris County for damages arising from State District Judge Albert Pruett's alleged failure to appoint counsel to defend him from drug charges in timely fashion. A panel of this court recently concluded that Texas district judges act for the state in appointing counsel for indigent criminal defendants, and the county is not responsible under Sec. 1983 for their actions in this regard. Hamill v. Wright, 870 F.2d 1032 (5th Cir.1989). We affirm on that basis. See also Clark v. Tarrant County, 798 F.2d 736, 744 (5th Cir.1986) (Texas district judges "are undeniably state elected officials"); Holloway v. Walker, 765 F.2d 517 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1037, 106 S.Ct. 605, 88 L.Ed.2d 583 (1985); Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297 (5th Cir.1980).

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/893/f2d/757 · .json · Public domain