Stallworth v. City of Cleveland’s Empirical Analysis
893 F.2d 830 · 1990
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably Eagle Properties, Ltd. v. Scharbauer (1991), Gentek Building Products, Inc. Steel Peel Litigation Trust, v. The Sherwin-Williams Company (2007)
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger · Aldinger v. Howard · Zahn v. International Paper Co. · Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the party required to pay the money failed to make a good faith effort to settle the case and that the party to whom the money is to be paid did not fail to make a good faith effort to settle the case.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a grant of jurisdiction over claims involving particular parties,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A party has not “failed to make a good faith effort to settle” under R.C. 1343.-03(C) if he has (1) fully cooperated with discovery proceedings, (2) rationally evaluated his risks and potential liability, (3) not attempted to unnecessarily delay any of the proceedings, and (4) made a good faith monetary settlement offer or responded in good faith to an offer from the other party. If a party has a good faith, objectively reasonable belief that he has no liability, he need not make a monetary settlement offer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.