United States v. Hull’s Empirical Analysis
893 F.3d 1221 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Beckles v. United States · United States v. Mike · United States v. White · United States v. Souser · United States v. Muñoz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the advisory Sentencing 'Guidelines are not subject to a vagueness challenge under the Due Process Clause' because ... they only 'guide the exercise of a court's discretion in choosing an appropriate sentence within the statutory range.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“clearly and specifically states that [the defendant] must provide notice when required to do so by his probation officer,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an oral pronouncement of sentence from the bench controls over written language”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.