Giunta v. Dingman’s Empirical Analysis
893 F.3d 73 · 2018
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2024
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. · Radiation Dynamics, Inc. v. Goldmuntz · Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd. v. Ficeto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review de novo a district court's dismissal of a complaint under Rule 12(b)(6), accepting all of the complaint's factual allegations as true and drawing all reasonable inferences in the plaintiffs' favor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.