McDaniel v. Upsher-Smith Labs., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
893 F.3d 941 · 2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 337 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 355 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)
Relies on Hines v. Davidowitz · Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul · Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan Association v. D Cuesta · Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn. · Buckman Company V.' Legal Committee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as a drug of last resort for patients suffering from ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia, both life-threatening heartbeat irregularities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.