In re Zappos.com, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Volt Information Sciences Inc v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University · Southland Corp. v. Keating
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] party cannot assent to terms of which it has no knowledge or constructive notice, and a highly inconspicuous hyperlink buried among a sea of links does not provide such notice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“inconspicuous, buried in the middle to bottom of every ... webpage among many other links, and the website never direct[ed] a user to the Terms of Use”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“requires users to expressly manifest assent to the terms by, for example, clicking an 'I accept’ button.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.