Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 893 FSUPP2D 976 - Mack v. Stryker Corp.

Mack v. Stryker Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
April 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr · Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. · Enterprise Bank v. Magna Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When all is said and done, not one of Rodriguez’s thirteen articles shows that medical experts understood in 2004 that infusing a joint with bupivacaine for two days could cause irreversible cartilage damage. [The manufacturer] had no duty to understand what the relevant medical literature did not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.