Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 893 NE2D 1107 - Triplett v. USX Corp.

Triplett v. USX Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Daub v. Daub · Loomis v. Ameritech Corp. · 164 Ind. App. 67 - Marsh v. Lesh · Hannan v. Pest Control Services, Inc. · Sand Creek Country Club, Ltd. v. CSO Architects, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While not binding on Indiana courts, we observe that the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure permit citation to unpublished opinions issued after January 1, 2007. FRAP 32.1(a).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) As used in this chapter, “occupational disease” means a disease arising out of and in the course of the employment. Ordinary diseases of life to which the general public is exposed outside of the employment shall not be compensa-ble, except where such diseases follow as an incident of an occupational disease as defined in this section. (b) A disease arises out of the employment only if there is apparent to the rational mind, upon consideration of all of the circumstances, a direct causal connection between the conditions under which the work is performed and the occupational disease, and which can be seen to have followed as a natural incident of the work as a result of the exposure occasioned by the nature of the employment, and which can be fairly traced to the employment as the proximate cause, and which does not come from a hazard to which workers would have been equally exposed outside of the employment. The disease must be incidental to the character of the business and not independent of the relation of employer and employee. The disease need not have been foreseen or expected but after its contraction it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “). The Act provides compensation for personal injury or death by accident arising out of and in the course of employment. Ind.Code § 22-33-22. In evaluating the Board's decision, we employ a two-tiered standard of review. Triplett v. USX Corp., 893 N.E.2d 1107, 1116 (Ind.Ct.App.2008), trans. denied. First, we review the record to determine if there is any competent evidence of probative value to support the Board's findings. Id. We then assess whether the findings are sufficient to support the decision. Id.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.