State v. Boecker’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Nixon · United States v. Vonn · Barnhart Commissioner of Social Security v. Peabody Coal Co et al. · Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc. · Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The plain language of the statute controls when the meaning of the statute is unambiguous.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“A statute is ambiguous only when the statutory language is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bergman v. Caulk · State v. Bowen“the Legislature's statement of intent as expressed in the ... session laws must be considered along with the codified language of the statute when analyzing the entire statute's plain meaning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Oreskovich
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.