State v. Rawlings’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2014
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Board of Pardons v. Allen · Nogueras v. Puerto Rico International Airlines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the trial court lacked the authority to extend [defendant’s] probation based on the absence of a proper motion before the court.” , 6 . Smith was decided under a prior version of the statute which provided that “[a]fter a hearing, the Court may increase or decrease the probation period and may revoke or modify any condition of probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martin““a defendant may waive his or her constitutional right to due process. However, ‘[ujnder the due process clause, [a defendant is] entitled to have [adequate notice] imparted to him [or her]; that he [or she] might make an intelligent and informed decision as to whether to waive his [or her] constitutional right to a ... hearing.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]here notice is ambiguous or inadequate to inform a party of the nature of the proceedings against him [or her] or not given sufficiently in advance of the proceeding to permit preparation, a party is deprived of due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State Ex Rel. Mw
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.