Chapman v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 602 So. 2d 344 - IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc. · Borders v. City of Huntsville · Flagstar Enterprises, Inc. v. Foster · Lockhart v. Phenix City Inv. Co. · 877 So. 2d 566 - Cain v. Howorth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(1) Is licensed by the appropriate regulatory board or agency of this or some other state. "(2) Is trained and experienced in the same specialty. "(3) Is certified by an appropriate American board in the same specialty. "(4) Has practiced in this specialty during the year preceding the date that the alleged breach of the standard of care occurred."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.