893 So. 2d 708 - Szucs v. QUALICO DEVELOPMENT, INC.’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 760 So. 2d 126 - Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach · 432 So. 2d 660 - Bowman v. Kingsland Development, Inc. · Hooters of America v. CAROLINA WINGS · Claffey v. Serafino · FINKEL OUTDOOR PROD., INC. v. Lasky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Damages are liquidated when the proper amount to be awarded can be determined with exactness from the cause of action as pleaded; i.e., from a pleaded agreement between the parties, by an arithmetical calculation or by application of definite rules of law.... However, damages are not liquidated if the ascertainment of their exact sum requires the taking of testimony to ascertain facts upon which to base a value judgment."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.