Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

893 So. 2d 868

In re King

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 4, 2005

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2005-02-04

Decided 2005-02-04

¶1ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

¶2The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent failed to promptly remit funds to a third party and failed to properly supervise a non-lawyer assistant. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

¶3IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Henry B. King, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 8426, be publicly reprimanded.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the- matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to . commence thirty days from the date of finality of. this court’s judgment until paid.

TRAYLOR, J., would reject the petition.
/893/so2d/868 · .json · Public domain