John v. John’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
May 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dame v. Dame · Clark v. Clark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). [3] Ky.App., 893 S.W.2d 373 (1995) [4] John, 893 S.W.2d at 375 ("However, we believe the Dame case is controlling in this circumstance. Dame unequivocally holds, noting the purposes of KRS 403.110 and particularly the need for finality between divorcing parties, that lump-sum maintenance awards, paid in one installment or many installments, are not subject to modification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Messer v. Messer“the court cannot add terms or conditions not set forth by the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Messer v. Messer“contains the entire understanding of the parties,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Messer v. Messer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.