Cain v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2000
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Liteky v. United States · Thomas v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama · Fuller v. State · Cannon v. State · Gaddis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]herefore, we hold that the substantial compliance provision of Article 26.13(c) can apply when the record affirmatively proves a defendant is a United States citizen, but the trial court fails to admonish the defendant about the immigration consequences of his guilty plea under [A]rticle 26.13(c)(4)[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cain v. State“the fact that if the defendant is not a citizen of the United States of America, a plea of guilty or nolo contendere for the offense charged may result in deportation, the exclusion from admission to this country, or the denial of naturalization under federal law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cain v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.