Schweinle v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1998
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 351st Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Montgomery v. State · Fussell v. Price · Thompson v. Virginia · Williams v. United States · Royster v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“intentionally or knowingly restrained the victim, without her consent, so as to interfere substantially with her liberty, by moving her from one place to another or by confining her.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schweinle v. State“refutes or negates other evidence establishing the greater offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schweinle v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.