Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 894 F.2d 1083 - United States v. Baker

United States v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

894 F.2d 1083 · 1990

Citation profile

125
cited by 125 later decisions
September 2024
most recently cited

94 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 125 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably United States v. Sarno (1995), United States v. Hicks (1991)

94 federal appellate ·

11201990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 1503

Relies on California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Guerra · United States v. Sanchez-Lopez · Davis v. Florida · United States v. Monaco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 125 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under such circumstances, where a formal evidentiary hearing would have served no purpose, the court's denial of [defendant's] motion for such a hearing could not have constituted an abuse of discretion.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “misrepresentations may not have actually misled the court ... [they] had the potential for obstructing justice and were therefore material for purposes of Sentencing Guidelines § 3C1.1”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “on its face encompasses 'attempted' obstruction of justice as well as actual obstruction.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.