United States v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
894 F.2d 1144 · 1990
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Kaul v. Stephan (1996), United States v. McKneely (1993)
25 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 25 U.S.C. § 1321
Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · United States v. Leon · Malley v. Briggs · Elkins v. United States · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where ... a reasonably well-trained law enforcement officer should himself have been aware that a proposed search would be illegal, a judicial officer's concurrence in the improper activity does not serve to bring it within the rule of Leon or Sheppard ”); People v. Camarella, 54 Cal.3d 592 , 286 Cal.Rptr. 780 , 818 P.2d 63, 70-71 (Cal.1991) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. People v. Leftwich“whether private property owned by non-Indians but situated within the boundaries of an Indian reservation is still 'Indian country' for jurisdictional purposes”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.