Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 894 F.2d 187 - Woods v. Dahlberg

Woods v. Dahlberg’s Empirical Analysis

894 F.2d 187 · 1990

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
August 2023
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably McGore v. Wrigglesworth (1997), Lister v. Department of Treasury (2005)

15 federal appellate · 4 district ·

1901990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Roberts v. United States District Court · Ambrose v. Welch · Foster v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a motion for injunctive relief; (2) a motion for judgment on the pleadings; (3) a motion for summary judgment; (4) a motion to dismiss/quash an information/indictment made by a defendant; (5) a motion to suppress evidence in a criminal case; (6) a motion to dismiss/permit maintenance of a class action; (7) a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and (8) a motion to involuntarily dismiss an action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[D]enial of [motion to proceed in forma pauperis] is the functional equivalent of an involuntary dismissal and is outside the scope of a magistrate's authority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “hear and determine any pretrial matter pending before the court,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.