Prince v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
894 F.2d 283 · 1990
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Cline v. Sullivan (1991), Smith v. Shalala (1993)
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Arkansas Public Service Commission v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. · Polaski v. Heckler · Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Crenshaw · Brown v. Schweitzer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“means such relevant evidence as a reasonable person might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. Id. See also Metcalf v. Heckler, 800 F.2d 793 , 794 (8th Cir.1986). Substantial evidence is”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Glassman v. Sullivan“[a]n ALJ's failure to consider or discuss a treating physician's opinion that a claimant is disabled constitutes error where, as here, the record contains no contradictory medical opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Black v. Apfel“[a] treating physician's opinion should be accorded substantial weight.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dixon v. Barnhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.