United States v. Tibesar’s Empirical Analysis
894 F.2d 317 · 1990
Citation profile
52 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably United States v. Ortega (1998), United States v. Spotted Elk (2008)
52 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 751 · 28 U.S.C. § 994
Relies on O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Mann v. Koob · United States v. Wood · Teamsters Local Union 657 v. Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]bsent abuse of discretion, we will not interfere with the District Court's determination of juror qualifications.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.