Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 894 F.2d 328 - Clem v. Sullivan

Clem v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

894 F.2d 328 · 1990

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

43 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Halray Harman v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (2000), Peggy Mayes v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner of Social Security (2001)

43 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

610199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Desrosiers v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Martinez v. Heckler · Key v. Heckler · Cristobal SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A claimant seeking remand must demonstrate that there is new evidence which is material, and that there is good cause for the failure to incorporate such evidence into the record in a prior proceeding.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “more than a mere scintilla but less than a preponderance; it is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “medically determinable physical or mental impairment ... which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.