United States v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
894 F.2d 355 · 1990
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably United States v. Turcks (1994), United States v. Wiles (1996)
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1644 (§ 134 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1693N (Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 3237
Relies on United States v. Bass · Bell v. United States · United States v. Broce · Bullock v. United States · Truong Dinh Hung v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Whoever— (2) knowingly and with intent to defraud traffics in or uses one or more unauthorized access devices during any one-year period, and by such conduct obtains anything of value aggregating $1,000 or more during that period; shall if the offense affects interstate or foreign commerce, be punished as provided in subsection (c) of this section.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Where Congress is not explicit, 'the locus delicti must be determined from the nature of the crime alleged and the location of the act or acts constituting it.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.