Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 894 F.2d 586 - Riddick v. Edmiston

Riddick v. Edmiston’s Empirical Analysis

894 F.2d 586 · 1990

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Reese v. Fulcomer (1991), Jones v. Ryan (1993)

8 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

2001990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Batson v. Kentucky · Rose v. Lundy · Griffith v. Kentucky · Barefoot v. Estelle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “circuit apparently does not base this additional safeguard on the Constitution itself, but instead imposes it in the exercise of its supervisory power, possibly to minimize disputes about whether the government has met its 'heavy burden' of showing an indicted defendant has waived his Sixth Amendment rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Riddick's nickname is Gump. After Riddick had been arrested for killing Badger in Suffolk, Virginia, and had waived extradition, two New Jersey investigators were sent to Virginia to return him to New Jersey. In Virginia, upon first seeing Riddick, these investigators greeted him with the name”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “After considering it, we are constrained to reject the reasoning of the cases in the Second Circuit and instead hold that the Miranda warnings the investigators gave Riddick were sufficient, on this record, to advise him of his Sixth Amendment post-indictment right to counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.