Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 894 F.2d 74 - United States v. Cianscewski

United States v. Cianscewski’s Empirical Analysis

894 F.2d 74 · 1990

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
July 2010
most recently cited

75 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably United States v. Kopp (1991), Feder v. Evans-Feder (1995)

75 federal appellate · 2 district ·

730199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 849 (§ 409 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 994 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963)

Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · Pullman-Standard v. Swint · Miller v. Fenton · Miller v. Florida · Mathews v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in effect on the date the defendant is sentenced.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[m]ore than minimal planning' is deemed present in any case involving repeated acts over a period of time, unless it is clear that each instance was purely opportune. Consequently, this adjustment will apply especially frequently in property offenses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “all such acts and omissions that were part of the same course of conduct or common scheme or plan as the offense of conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.