Vining v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2016
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 455 So. 2d 1364 - Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc. · Commercial Credit Co. v. Davidson · 420 So. 2d 1181 - Josephs v. Austin · Gray v. Austin · Silver v. Nelson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The tort of negligent misrepresentation occurs when there is a breach of the duty to supply correct information to the plaintiff.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“as an officer of the court, [the attorney] would certainly have had a duty to inform the court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re JLM, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.