Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 894 F.2d 871 - Harris v. Reed

Harris v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis

894 F.2d 871 · 1990

Citation profile

134
cited by 134 later decisions
10
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

61 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 134 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Woods v. State (1998), United States Simmons v. Gramley (1990)

61 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions — followed in 10 states

6401990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Michigan v. Long · Kimmelman v. Morrison · Harris v. Reed · Johnson v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 134 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “affirmatively establish that counsel's performance was both constitutionally deficient and that the deficiency prejudiced the outcome of the trial.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “must indulge a strong presumption that counsel's conduct falls within a wide range of reasonable professional assistance.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[j]ust as a reviewing court should not second guess the strategic decisions of counsel with the benefit of hindsight, it should also not construct strategic defenses which counsel does not offer.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.