Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 894 F.2d 996 - United States v. Thomas

United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

894 F.2d 996 · 1990

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
September 2006
most recently cited

35 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. Fernandez · United States v. Huff · United States v. Cruz · United States v. Stewart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The second felony conviction was a February 1987 conviction for assault with intent to inflict serious bodily injury for which Thomas received a sentence of two years. Although this offense is classified as an aggravated misdemeanor under state law, the District Court properly found that the conviction was a prior felony pursuant to the Guidelines which define [a] prior felony conviction as a prior conviction “for an offense punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, regardless of whether such offense is specifically designated as a felony and regardless of the actual sentence imposed.” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, comment, (n. 3).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is not required to inform the defendant of the applicable guideline range or the actual sentence he will receive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.