Dominguez v. Yahoo, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
894 F.3d 116 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Pennsylvania Eastern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 47 U.S.C. § 227
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Brown v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority · In re TMI Litigation · Pineda v. Ford Motor Co. · Fairview Township County of York Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“had the present capacity to function as an autodialer.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“), following ACA International , the Third Circuit revisited the issue and invalidated the 2015 Ruling. See Dominguez v. Yahoo, Inc. , 894 F.3d 116 , 119 (3d Cir. 2018) (" Dominguez II ")("In light of the D.C. Circuit's holding, we interpret the statutory definition of an autodialer as we did prior to the issuance of the 2015 Declaratory Ruling.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“not limited to its current configuration but also includes its potential functionalities.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.