Ho-Chunk, Inc. v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
894 F.3d 365 · 2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 1 U.S.C. § 1 (Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 2341 · 18 U.S.C. § 2342 · 18 U.S.C. § 2343 · 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. Stevens · Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation · Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation · Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of Indians · Nevadas v. Floyd Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“applies only to statutes that are both ambiguous and passed for the benefit of Indian tribes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.