Morley v. Cent. Intelligence Agency’s Empirical Analysis
894 F.3d 389 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 44 U.S.C. § 2107 (Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018) · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 50 U.S.C. § 431 (§ 701 of the National Security Act of 1947)
Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Koon v. United States · United States Department of Justice v. Tax Analysts · Briggs v. Pennsylvania Railroad · Milner v. Department of the Navy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“factors point in different directions, assuming no abuse of discretion in the district court's analysis of the individual factors, it will be the rare case when we can reverse a district court's balancing of the ... factors”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“recalcitrant in [their] opposition to a valid claim or otherwise engaged in obdurate behavior.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]ome delay past the 20-day mark is not necessarily ... unreasonable”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.