King v. Time Warner Cable Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
894 F.3d 473 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2112 · 28 U.S.C. § 2342 · 47 U.S.C. § 227 · 47 U.S.C. § 402
Relies on Saks v. Franklin Covey Co. · Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc. · GTE South, Inc. v. Morrison · McI Telecommunications Corporation McI Metro Access Transmission Services v. US West Communications the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission · ACA Int'l v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“invalidated that [FCC 2015 Declaratory Ruling] and thereby removed any deference we might owe to the views the FCC expressed in it”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“create[ ] a genuine dispute of fact as to whether [Yahoo's messaging service] had the present capacity to function as an autodialer by generating random or sequential telephone numbers and dialing those numbers.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“) ] ... to any telephone number assigned to a ... cellular telephone service, ... unless such call is made solely to collect a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United States.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.