Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 894 N.E.2d 1070 - Foddrill v. Crane

Foddrill v. Crane’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

1 district · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Taylor v. Fitzpatrick · Daub v. Daub · Booher v. State · Tincher v. Davidson · Topp v. Leffers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when a jury is given an incorrect instruction on the law, we will not reverse the judgment unless the party seeking a new trial shows 'a reasonable probability that substantial rights of the complaining party have been adversely affected.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.