King v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anglemyer v. State · Childress v. State · Anglemyer v. State · Reid v. State · In re Rawls
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not whether another sentence is more appropriate”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“after due consideration of the trial court's decision,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“an inappropriate sentence analysis does not involve an argument that the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing the defendant.” King v. State, 894 N.E.2d 265, 267 (Ind.Ct.App.2008). Further,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.