Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 894 NW2D 168 - State v. Washington

State v. Washington’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · State v. Maurstad · State v. Lawrence · State v. O'HAGAN · State v. Edmison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] prior felony conviction has decayed if, when 'computing the criminal history score[,] ... a period of fifteen years has elapsed since the date of discharge from or expiration of the sentence to the date of the current offense.' " Id. at 172 (alteration in original) (quoting Minn. Sent. Guidelines 2.B.1(c) ). Washington's 1996 conviction "decayed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A prior felony sentence ... must not be used in computing the criminal history score if a period of fifteen years has elapsed since the date of discharge from or expiration of the sentence to the date of the current offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “give written notice of the new primary address to the assigned corrections agent or to the law enforcement authority with which the person currently is registered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.