State v. Washington’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Olano · State v. Maurstad · State v. Lawrence · State v. O'HAGAN · State v. Edmison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] prior felony conviction has decayed if, when 'computing the criminal history score[,] ... a period of fifteen years has elapsed since the date of discharge from or expiration of the sentence to the date of the current offense.' " Id. at 172 (alteration in original) (quoting Minn. Sent. Guidelines 2.B.1(c) ). Washington's 1996 conviction "decayed”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Washington“A prior felony sentence ... must not be used in computing the criminal history score if a period of fifteen years has elapsed since the date of discharge from or expiration of the sentence to the date of the current offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Washington“give written notice of the new primary address to the assigned corrections agent or to the law enforcement authority with which the person currently is registered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Washington
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.