Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 894 P2D 422 - McClain v. Ricks Exploration Co.

McClain v. Ricks Exploration Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2014

4 state decisions

40199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co. · Fleet v. Sanguine, Ltd. · Stewart v. Amerada Hess Corp. · Hull v. Sun Refining and Marketing Co. · Kerr v. Hillenberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plaintiffs are estopped to have their leases cancelled. Similar to the facts in Thompson v. Johnson-Kemnitz Drilling Co. , 193 Okla. 507 , 145 P.2d 422 (1943), Plaintiffs knew of the drilling of the Elliott well, witnessed production and sale of the gas, and never made demand on the operator for release of their leases. Nor is there evidence Plaintiffs offered to pay their proportionate part of the drilling costs of the Elliott to the operator. Instead, they sat back and allowed Sanguine and Ricks to take all the risks on the Elliott and after the venture proved profitable, asserted a working interest in the well. As stated in Thompson , Plaintiffs have waited too long. They were under a duty to speak within a reasonable time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “its language is the only legitimate evidence of what the parties intended.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.