Jackinsky v. Jackinsky’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Andrew Robinson International, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance (2008), In Re Adoption of AFM (2001)
3 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moore v. State · Wright v. State · Jefferson v. Asplund · Johnson v. Alaska State Department of Fish & Game · Tolstrup v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the party against whom the preclusion is employed was a party to or in privity with a party to the first action; (2) the issue precluded from relitigation is identical to the issue decided in the first action; (3) the issue was resolved in the first action by a final judgment on the merits; and (4) the determination of the issue was essential to the final judgment.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“A valid and final judgment in an action brought to declare rights or other legal relations of the parties is conclusive in a subsequent action between them as to the matters declared, and, in accordance with the rules of issue preclusion, as to any issues actually litigated by them and determined in the action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the judgment may be conclusive ... with respect to one or more issues, if the parties have entered an agreement manifesting such an intention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Snook v. Bowers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.