Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

894 So. 2d 1088

Guzzardo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-03-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2007

1 state decisions

Relies on Faretta v. California

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-03-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this probation violation case, the State properly concedes that the trial court erred by failing to follow any of the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d) and Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), before requiring Appellant to proceed to hearing without benefit of counsel. The judgment and sentence are, therefore, reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

¶2REVERSED and REMANDED.

PETERSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
/894/so2d/1088 · .json · Public domain