Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

894 So. 2d 1095

In re Gaudin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 25, 2005

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2005-02-25

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2006

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-02-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

¶2The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent improperly charged interest to clients on advances or loans made prior to settlement and failed to promptly remit funds to a third party. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which they stipulate respondent has made full restitution in both matters. Having reviewed the petition,

¶3IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Pierre F. Gaudin, Louisiana Bar Roll number 5976, be publicly reprimanded.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent attend the Louisiana State Bar Association s Ethics School program and furnish proof to the ODC demonstrating he has successfully completed that program.

¶5IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

/894/so2d/1095 · .json · Public domain