Cherry v. Cherry’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 492 So. 2d 1193 - Bergeron v. Bergeron · 856 So. 2d 36 - Mimms v. Brown · 775 So. 2d 471 - Evans v. Nogues
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . . the court finding that sole custody in favor of [the father] clearly and convincingly to be in the best interest of the children, considering all pertinent facts and circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lucky v. Way · Poole v. Poole“This was not the typical consent judgment presented to the judge for his signature by the parties without a hearing. The record reflects that this judgment was only agreed to by the parties after three days of hearings during the course of which sufficient evidence was entered into the record to substantiate the Bergeron factors. Accordingly, we find no error in the trial court's judgment * * * holding that the * * * custody order was a "considered judgment."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lucky v. Way
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.