Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

894 So. 2d 288

Glowacki v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 9, 2005

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-02-09

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2018

14 state decisions

Relies on Windisch v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-02-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

VILLANTI, Judge.

¶1We affirm Mark Glowacki’s conviction for DUI causing serious bodily injury but remand for entry of an order correcting certain sentencing errors.

¶2While Glowacki’s appeal was pending, he filed a motion to correct sentencing errors, objecting to certain costs. The trial court granted this motion but did not enter a corrected judgment and sentence. Glo-wacki argues, and the State properly concedes, that the trial court must enter a new judgment and sentence indicating the objected-to costs have been stricken. We therefore reverse and remand for the ministerial entry of a corrected judgment and sentence at which Glowacki need not be present. See Windisch v. State, 709 So.2d 606 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

¶3Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CASANUEVA and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
/894/so2d/288 · .json · Public domain